Current:Home > reviewsGeorgia House takes a step toward boosting pay for the state’s judges -WealthMindset Learning
Georgia House takes a step toward boosting pay for the state’s judges
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-07 13:28:38
ATLANTA (AP) — Lawmakers are taking the first step toward giving Georgia’s judges a big pay raise, while also seeking to reduce gaping pay disparities between superior court judges in different parts of the state.
The state House voted 154-13 on Thursday to pass House Bill 947, which would put into law guidelines for raising and standardizing pay. The bill goes on to the Senate for more debate, and lawmakers would have to later budget the money for the increases.
The state would have to spend $21 million next year for all the increases, but House Appropriations Committee Chairman Matt Hatchett, a Dublin Republican, recently told The Associated Press that he anticipates any increases would be phased in over multiple years.
Judges have been pushing for the changes, saying that pay hasn’t kept pace with what lawyers can make in private practice, leading some qualified lawyers to step down from the bench or never seek to become judges in the first place.
State Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael Boggs, in his Feb. 7 State of the Judiciary address to lawmakers said it’s “critical that the state compensate the state’s judges sufficiently to attract good ones and keep them.”
The plan would link top pay for judges to what federal judges in Atlanta make. State Supreme Court justices could see their pay rise from $186,000 to more than $223,000, while Court of Appeals judges could see their pay rise from $185,000 now to $212,000.
The picture is more complicated for superior court judges, who hear cases across Georgia’s 50 judicial circuits. The state now contributes $142,000 a year toward their salaries, but counties give local supplements, with urban counties typically paying more. That means that in Augusta, Columbia County or DeKalb County, superior court judges now make almost $222,000 a year, substantially more than state Supreme Court justices, while in two rural multi-county circuits in eastern and southwestern Georgia, judges make less than $154,000 a year.
A survey last year by the state Judicial Council found 81% of superior court judges thought the current system was unfair and 81% thought the current system made it hard to get qualified lawyers to become judges.
State Rep. Rob Leverett, the Elberton Republican sponsoring the bill, told House members that the ability of superior court judges to earn more than Supreme Court justices means pay is “upside down.” And he said there’s no reason for such a wide disparity in superior court judge pay, since the state tries to make sure each judge hears a roughly equal number of cases.
“To put it plainly, there’s no reason that a judge out in a rural area should make so much less than a judge in an urban area,” Leverett said.
Under the proposed system, the state would pay superior court judge as much as $201,000, while counties could add a 10% locality supplement, bringing total pay to $221,000.
Sitting judges would be allowed to keep their current pay if it was higher. The Georgia Constitution doesn’t allow the pay of sitting judges to be decreased during their current term of office. New judges would be required to be paid under the new system.
Complicating adoption is that other judges, district attorneys and public defenders have their pay tied to superior court judges. Under Leverett’s plans, there would be a one-year pause before the pay of affected state court judges and juvenile court judges would rise. During that time, a county could ask its local lawmakers to amend pay of the other judges if it didn’t want to pay them more. Pay for other officials wouldn’t rise until a county acted.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Prince Harry, Duchess Meghan speak out on social media's affect on mental health: 'Children are dying'
- DJ Moore is first Bears wide receiver since 1999 to win NFC Offensive Player of the Week
- In 'Dicks: The Musical', broad jokes, narrow audience
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Astros on the brink of seventh straight ALCS with Game 3 win vs. Twins
- Billy Ray Cyrus Marries Firerose in Beautiful, Joyous Ceremony
- GOP links $6 billion in Iran prisoner swap to Hamas attack on Israel, but Biden officials say funds are untouched
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- China loses team eventing place at Paris Olympics because horse found with a ‘controlled medication’
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- There's something fishy about your seafood. China uses human trafficking to harvest it.
- Ariana Madix Emotionally Reacts to Sign From Her Late Dad After DWTS Tribute Performance
- Salman Rushdie's new memoir 'Knife' to chronicle stabbing: See release date, more details
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- We got free period products in school bathrooms by putting policy over politics
- Scene of a 'massacre': Inside Israeli kibbutz decimated by Hamas fighters
- Panama, Costa Rica agree to a plan to speed migrants passing through from Darien Gap
Recommendation
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
New Zealand immigration hits an all-time high as movement surges following pandemic lull
Orioles get swept for 1st time in 2023, lose AL Division Series in 3 games to Rangers
California's 'Skittles ban' doesn't ban Skittles, but you might want to hide your Peeps
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Sex education classes often don’t include LGBTQ+ students. New restrictions could make it worse
Southern California jury delivers $135M verdict in molestation case involving middle school teacher
Sex education classes often don’t include LGBTQ+ students. New restrictions could make it worse