Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court rejects R. Kelly's child sexual abuse appeal, 20-year sentence stands -WealthMindset Learning
Supreme Court rejects R. Kelly's child sexual abuse appeal, 20-year sentence stands
View
Date:2025-04-15 14:59:04
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear imprisoned former R&B superstar R. Kelly's appeal of his 2022 federal conviction on charges involving child pornography and luring underage girls to have sex with him, one of two cases in which he was found guilty of sex crimes.
The justices turned away Kelly's challenge to a lower court's decision upholding his conviction by a federal jury in Chicago.
Kelly, 57, claimed in his Supreme Court filing that prosecutors filed the charges against him in the case after the statute of limitations had expired.
During that trial, several women testified that Kelly sexually abused them when they were minors. The jury also was shown video of Kelly molesting his goddaughter, who testified that the abuse began in the 1990s when she was a teenager.
Kelly, born Robert Sylvester Kelly, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in the case. He was found guilty of three child pornography counts and three counts of enticing minors for sex, but acquitted of seven other charges that included obstruction of justice and conspiracy to receive child pornography.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Kelly in 2021 was convicted in another trial by a jury in New York City's borough of Brooklyn on all nine charges he faced, including racketeering and eight counts of violating the Mann Act, which forbids transporting people across state lines for prostitution. He was given a 30-year prison sentence in that case, set to largely overlap with his sentence in the Chicago case.
Kelly is incarcerated at a Butner, North Carolina federal prison and is eligible for release in 2045, according to federal Bureau of Prisons records.
Where is Diddy being held?New York jail that housed R. Kelly, Ghislaine Maxwell
Kelly filed his Supreme Court appeal after the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April rejected his challenge.
veryGood! (77665)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Intellectuals vs. The Internet