Current:Home > FinanceBowe Bergdahl's conviction vacated by federal judge -WealthMindset Learning
Bowe Bergdahl's conviction vacated by federal judge
View
Date:2025-04-12 14:20:30
Former U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was court-martialed for desertion during his tour of Afghanistan, had his conviction vacated on Tuesday by a federal judge, who said a military judge had failed to disclose a potential conflict of interest.
Prior to ruling on Bergdahl's case, the military judge had submitted an application for a position as an immigration judge in the Justice Department under then-President Donald Trump, Judge Reggie B. Walton wrote in Tuesday's order.
The military judge "should have disclosed his job application as a potential ground for his disqualification," Walton wrote.
Bergdahl walked away from his base in Afghanistan and was held prisoner by the Taliban for years. U.S. officials reached a deal in 2014 for his release, exchanging five members of the Taliban for him.
Bergdahl was charged with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. His court-martial was held in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, from 2015 to 2017.
During that court-martial, Bergdahl's lawyers filed a motion for dismissal, saying statements by Sen. John McCain and Trump were influencing the trial.
Trump had been critical of Bergdahl, repeatedly "vilifying" him before and during his successful 2016 election campaign, Walton wrote, adding a list of insulting names Trump had called the sergeant.
Bergdahl's motion for dismissal "specifically referenced the former president’s desire that the plaintiff be convicted and how he should be punished," Walton wrote.
"Thus, the Court concludes that, based upon the military judge’s job application to an executive branch position -- a situation in which he might reasonably be expected to appeal to the president’s expressed interest in the plaintiff’s conviction and punishment -- 'it would appear to a reasonable person,' 'knowing all the circumstances,' 'that [the judge]’s impartiality was in jeopardy,'" Walton wrote, citing in quotes precedents from previous decisions.
What happened in Afghanistan and the ensuing high-profile trial were the subject of the second season of the popular "Serial" podcast.
veryGood! (199)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Ranking
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Sam Taylor
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Recommendation
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Travis Hunter, the 2
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat