Current:Home > NewsMore gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules -WealthMindset Learning
More gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:55:51
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Thursday it had officially eliminated restrictions that had previously prohibited many blood donations by gay and bisexual men — a longstanding policy that critics say is discriminatory.
In a news release, the federal agency said it will recommend a series of "individual risk-based questions" that will be the same for every blood donor, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender or sex. Those who have had anal sex with a new sexual partner, or more than one sexual partner, within the last three months would be asked to wait to donate blood.
"The implementation of these recommendations will represent a significant milestone for the agency and the LGBTQI+ community," Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in the release.
With the updated guidelines, most gay and bisexual men who are in a monogamous relationship with a man will no longer have to refrain from sex in order to donate blood.
Previously, FDA guidelines for donating blood — which were last updated in 2020 — stated that men who have sex with men are allowed to donate blood after a three-month deferral period in which they refrain from having sex with another man.
While the number of people eligible to donate blood has expanded, the agency said it will continue to monitor the safety of the blood supply.
The 40-year-old restrictions were to protect the blood supply from HIV
Restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV.
At first, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. But over time, the FDA ultimately relaxed the lifetime ban. However, the agency still kept some limits in place.
The newly updated guidelines are aimed at addressing years-long criticisms that the previous policy was discriminatory and outdated, and posed yet another barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply.
Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
And for decades, organizations including the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and numerous LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have called for a rule change.
The changes are a mostly welcome shift in a new direction, advocates say
Reaction to the news has been mostly positive from advocates, medical groups and blood banks.
"This shift toward individual donor assessments prioritizes the safety of America's blood supply while treating all donors with the fairness and respect they deserve," said Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers, a non-profit organization that brings together community-based and independent blood centers, in a statement.
Fry said that the FDA's final guidance is based on data that shows the best protection against diseases, like HIV, is through strong testing of all blood donation — and a uniform screening process for each donor.
President and CEO of GLAAD Sarah Kate Ellis echoed that approval in a statement, saying "The FDA's decision to follow science and issue new recommendations for all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation, who selflessly donate blood to help save lives, signals the beginning of the end of a dark and discriminatory past rooted in fear and homophobia,"
However, Ellis said while the new guidance is a step in the right direction, there is still a barrier for LGBTQ+ people who are on PrEP, an FDA-approved drug proven to prevent the transmission of HIV, who may want to donate blood.
"GLAAD urges the FDA to continue to prioritize science over stigma and treat all donors and all blood equally," she added.
NPR's Rob Stein and Will Stone contributed to this report.
veryGood! (91)
Related
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Lisa Blunt Rochester could make history with a victory in Delaware’s US Senate race
- North Dakota measures would end local property taxes and legalize recreational marijuana
- Marshon Lattimore trade grades: Did Commanders or Saints win deal for CB?
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Massachusetts voters weigh ballot issues on union rights, wages and psychedelics
- Opinion: 76ers have themselves to blame for Joel Embiid brouhaha
- The top US House races in Oregon garnering national attention
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Texas border districts are again in the thick of the fight for House control
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- A Guide to JD Vance's Family: The Vice Presidential Candidate's Wife, Kids, Mamaw and More
- Democrat Ruben Gallego faces Republican Kari Lake in US Senate race in Arizona
- Need a distraction from Election Day results? Here are five sporting events on TV Tuesday.
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Control of Congress is at stake and with it a president’s agenda
- Republican incumbent Josh Hawley faces Democrat Lucas Kunce for US Senate seat in Missouri
- Control of Congress is at stake and with it a president’s agenda
Recommendation
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Republicans try to hold onto all of Iowa’s 4 congressional districts
US Rep. John Curtis is favored to win Mitt Romney’s open Senate seat in Utah
Democrat Matt Meyer and Republican Michael Ramone square off in Delaware’s gubernatorial contest
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Ready to spend retirement savings? What to know about a formula for safe withdrawals
Is oat milk good for you? Here's how it compares to regular milk.
Selena Gomez Claps Back at “Sick” Body-Shaming Comments After Emilia Perez Premiere